The novel's setting contributes to the authenticity of the setting in many ways. For example, in the setting of "Killer Angels" you could easily tell that it was a battlefield andthat there was some type of war going on also that there were people dying everywhere. very small amount of green ground left because there was blood all of it. Also in a historical novel setting is everything. The setting sets the tone and the mood. Also the setting helps express the true feelings that were going on in that time period. So the setting must be accurate and authentic.

In a historical novel, the setting must be accurate and authentic because it emphazies the story. You can't have a war on top of a hill, etc. The setting must also contribute to the story's title. For example "Out of the Dust" gives the desert like feeling from the story so if you have the story in a grassland or some kind of tropical plot it would make no sense.

The historical element contributed to the authencity of the novel as the whole. For example, the novel, "Killer Angel" was based during the time of the Civil War in America. By adding the authentic character such as Robert E. Lee, James Longstreet, John Buford, Lawrence Chamberlain, etc. the author gives the novel an accurarte setting. Robert E. Lee was the "leader" of the South, like in the novel. He called the shots, in both real life and the novel! A historical setting must have a setting that is accurate and authentic because it supports the genre of historical ficiton. In the novel, it focused on the Battle of Gettysburg. If the setting was not so accurate, the reader will not believe in the authencity of the novel; they will not believe that the author has "factual" content of the battle!

The novel Killer Angels is about the Civil War. Specifically the Battle of Gettysburg. If the setting of the novel was anywhere else the novel would not make any sense. That is why it is so important for histroical novels to be historically correct.

Setting is what makes the novel authentic, along with the characters and events. Without the correct setting, the novel is no longer authentic. For example, if Killer Angels took place on Planet X, it wouldn't be authentic.

I Agree with Delise and Jharana. Good Job ! : )

The Historical Element did contribute to the authenticity of the novel as a whole. In a historical novel, the setting must be accurate and authentic because then you would find the event more realistic rather than just something totally made up. You can base the novel's setting on real events that happened durring that time era. You can also just find it to be a more interesting read because its based on something that really happened.

The setting must be accurate and authentic in a historical novel to contribute to the other elements in the plot. For example, in the Killer Angel's the setting was the Civl War in Gettysburg. This reflected on how the characters acted and what was going on. Robert E. Lee was the leader of the south.This reflected on his actions and what he told the others to do. The things that were going on was the revolutinary battles. These parts contibuted to the time pireod of the novel and how the setting must be accurate and authentic.

In a historical novel the setting must be accurate and authentic because it emphazises the mood and tone of the story that is trying to be implied. It creates the "it" factor that is required within the book. In Killer Angels the setting was a battlefield which resulted in a nice tone being conveyed. That is what i think about how setting must be accurate.

So true xD

The novel's setting contributes to the authenticity of the setting because it makes the story seem more real. If you have a book like KIller Angels and have a setting like Little House on the Prairie, it wouldn't make sense and no one would read it.

Yes the historal elemets do contribe to the novel in a whole. The setting must be accurate so the reader can relate to the setting and compare in to the characters. For example in Killer Angel you can tell why the characters are acting like soilders and talking about war because they are in a battle setting.

The historical element contribute to the authenticity because it makes it much more realistic and believable.If not the story will seem so fake and no one would understand you.So I agree with ya :)

In a historcal fiction the setting is needed in order for the story to be realistic. A historical fiction is only historical if it takes place in a real time and place and includes some factual information. If the setting in a historical fiction l is not authentic then the story isnt historical its just fiction.

If the setting is unrealistic, like candy and marshmellow clouds its not going be authentic. The historical element gives it that extra something to make you believe its real.

The Historical Element did contribute to the authenticity of the novel as a whole. It emphazises the mood and tone of the story that is trying to be implied.

In a historical novel the setting must be accurate because it tells you when an important event may of accured like in Killer Angels the setting described where they were during the war and that's what it sorta looked like in real life and on the movie.

Yes, i agree with the statement , the setting in a historical fiction novel must be accurate because the authenticity influences the history and gives the reader an idea of that time period, better than if the setting was unrealistic.

The Historical element contributes to the authencity of the novel as a whole because the setting has to be accurate and authentic because it emphasizes the story. For example, in the novel "Killer Angels" you can tell that the setting was a battlefield and that there was a war going on.

In historical fiction novels the setting must be accurate because it emphasizes the historical event that occured at this time period. For example, if the setting is taking place at a beach, it shouldn't be explaining a war. If the setting is correct it creates the perfect mood. In KIller Angels, when they explained any battle scene, it was in an open space, lots of chaos, and a gloomy mood is created.

In a historical novel the setting is shown clearly because in Killer Angles the setting was the battlefields that the Union and the confedeates fought on. The novel is authentic by all the characters in the novel. The author uses real characters name's from the actual battels like in Killer Angels the author used real names like General E. Lee. So that is how the author makes the novel authentic.

The setting is one of the most important factors in a historical fiction.An example being how the Battle of Gettysburg took place in Gettysburg and not in a area that doesn't make since. This shows how the setting makes historical fiction more authentic

I agree with lilly because it does go with the tone and mood of the story.Which makes it much more realistic:) lol I feel werid doing this:)

the setting in a historical novel must be accurate and authentic because it plays an important role in the story. The setting helps determine what is going on in the story. Also, it determines what the mood of the story is. For example, the setting in Killer Angels was a battle field which was what the story was about. Also since the setting was a battlefield it made the mood of the story intense. In conclusion if the events in the novel are not authentic, the setting will make the novel not as believable.

The setting must be accurate and authentic because if it is not it will make nos ense so the reader. The novel would not be understood. For example, In killer Angels the setting consisted of many different places like forts, hils, battle, and camps. This matched the story because the story was about the civil war and the setting made the story seem like the characters were actually at war.

Yes I agree because if the setting was not accurate the whole story would very confusing.

The setting must be accurate because if it's a historical noval it meas that something happened in history. You can't make up history. History is something that really happened. The setting must also be accurate because it's a real place about an actual event that happened in history.

Diamond why didn't you agree or disagree with my comment?

the setting in a historical novel must be authentic because the setting plays a major role in the story. and the setting emphasizes the historical event that occured at this time period. for example if there was a story about dust storms the setting shoulden't be in a place were there are never dust storms but a place like texas were recently a dust storm happend.

i dont know should i agree or diagree help me

yes i agree the book had lots of authenticity due happening during actual events like the fictional family in out of the dust it shows what it was like in the dust bowl for an actual family that lived in the dust bowl

Yes, the setting does relate to the realness of the story because its a real story,its first person, and it tells the history of the Oklahoma dust bowl.

the novel contributes it authentincy in alot of ways like in killer angels it was about the civil war it was at forts and other different places.And theit also has to be accurate to make it seem real and beliveable

I agree with Darwuim because the setting does play a major part in the story.

Yes, i agree with the statement because the setting in a historical fiction novel must be accurate and authentic in order to be a historical novel. The setting has to be the same as the main idea in order not to confuse readers.

Yes, the setting should be authentic/accurate because if the setting is completely different from the main idea of the passage it will confuse the reader. This would make the main idea harder to figure out!

I agree beacuse each historical book has differnt feelings and describesss what the author trying to say . Its have differnt tones and moods

The Historical Element contributed to the authenticity of the novel to its entirity. It express intensely the mood and tone of the story.

the history is... i love doggies,and marshmellows!

Glenn you spelled you wrong but I also agrre with you because if you don't emphasize the mood.

yes i agree with nadia and jailah because it does make it real and it is first person so you might belive its real my dogs name is kipper

hi

i knoe tht jayla it was a error leave me alone yo stop triipn off me

Wow abimbola, but what were you saying was true and was right?

The setting must be accurate because this is a nonfiction book and the things in it must be true. If it wasn't then it wouldn't be called a non-fiction now would it?

4real i dont know

I Wasnt Here Last Yea.....And My Last Historical Book I Read Was " Roll Of Thunder, Hear My Cry"................

Don't get smart glenn. Spelled my name all wrong though.

i agree with Gerard and Glenn. The authenticity does set the mood in the story.

Yes, the setting in a historical book must be accurate because the setting gives you the feel of the story . In "Out Of The Dust" the fact that they gave us the time and setting of the story made everything more believeable.

I agree with Erica 100%

i agree with everyone that commented

I truly agree

yes the setting in a history book must be accurate because if its not the story gets confusing and doesnt set the right mood for the reader.

The setting MUST be on point because if you are not on point, when the story is actually based on a desert, you say the setting is a winter wonderland. See? Makes no sense.The better the setting, The better you will understand the storyline. Because hey... there is no snow in a desert...

No because the novel was not historical at all

I AGREE WITH ERICA B

i think that the setting sets the mood in the story,also that the historical element did contribute to the authencity

yea it was anthony

Yes the setting must be accurate because the author whats you to get a good feeling of the mood.

Yes it was because it told us about the dust bowl and that really happened in HISTORY

I agree with disagree with everybody

That last comment was to anthony

yes i agree becuse the text of out of the dust gives the setting through out all of the story. first in the chapters they would tell u about the the date and the setting.

yes, agree with david!!!!!!

heyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyy IVY

you make no sence anthony just stop commenting

I DISSAGREE WITH ANTHONY D

did u even read the book anthony?

I meant to say i disagree with everybody

hi zoekinz

i do think think that the historical element contributed to the authenticity because it seemed to be set in a time when racism was still in tact, since it seemed the cover was stressing the fact it was an african american family.

yes i do think that the historical element contribute to the authenticity of the novel as a whole because all the event that happened in the story contributed to "historic elements" that happened in the story....

dont agree with me ivy!

heyyyyyyyyyyy zoe!!

how u doing zoe my belt is mest up again

i agree with jalah
and all of the other people who agreed with thin statement

david

I Agree With Zoe !!!!!! =))

I AGREE WITH KANE ABOUT ANTHONY

PEOPLE.... PLEASE PUT SOME SENSE INTO YOUR COMMENTS... IM NOT GETTING DETENTION FOR YOUR LACK OF INTELLEGENCE!!!

Yes i agree with some people about the mood of the settings and the historical element of the book is accurate.The book out of the dust was a interrested and sad book the fiction books that we perviously read was very boring cause they didnt interest me but the books i liked were fiction and called Out of the dust.

I agree with Ercia.

Yess , ii Agree With Erica The Story " Out Of The Dust " Must be Accurate because , The Setting Gives The Story true Feeling & , The Front Pictutre Even Adds On to The Setting it Looks Sorrowful . ( Giggles ) Haha =).

wow kane

WASSUP CLASS MATESSSS

hi

i agree with everybody who agreed that agrreed

@Kane how does tellin somebody to be quiet have to do with anything we are soppose to be talkin about the book what are yall doing smh

seriously.... some serious dummies in here.

I dont get that amber

smart to say amber...i think

yes it contributes to the novel

I agree with David

GOD DANG WE ARE TALKING ABOUT THE BOOK!


REALLY A SHAME....Thought you were smart...

I Agreeee With David ....... = )

GUYS.... ALL YOUR COMMENTS ARE ABOUT EACH OTHER.... :'( what happened to peace.... WHAT HAPPENED!!

In historical fiction novels the settings must be accurate to the stroy because, the settings explains what was happening in that year/event where the characters lives. Also,the novel "Out of the Dust" the historcal elemnet allowed the main idea more intersting.

The setting in a historical book must be accurate because it helps the reader understand the situation and it makes them believe that they are really there.For the book "Out Of The Dust" they used historical and actual events that really happened to make the story realistic and authentic.

i Argree !!
but not YHu Stacy No Offense but ZOeyyy

I agree the setting does help you understand the story

Yes i agree with some people about the mood of the settings and the historical element of the book is accurate.And it also helps the reader understand the situation.

yes they did because the true parts of the story made people want to read it more.

it is important because you need to have the feeling make it so they feel how the characters felt.so they can vizualize the setting.

i agree

I agree... that is all

A historic novel should be accurate and authentic because historic novels should include facts about what happen in the past,future,or present.For example, in "OUT OF THE DUST"it was about how someone had to overcome going throught large dust storms with it getting into cars and causing it to make cars stop working.In other words histroic novels should be accurate in oder to be authentic

me to

I agree the setting does help you understand the story because it helps the reader better understand the situation & you feel as if you were there .

it Important bEcause The characters Nedd to have Feeling and yhu need kno how tHey feel i That My Opinion

Kyla hacking your page because mine isnt working, I agree with Shaun.

also if Should Right so Readers Can Understand Better

I agree because historical fiction books are mostly about something that can happen & also the story reach the point that made it accurate because it helped the reader understand and mabe even be able to recall the situation

I AGREE ...

I agree with sandra's statement

I agree with Jabreel about the over all concept

I don't know so i'm going to guess

AGREEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEE!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

its a historical novel because the story took place in the 1900's i think. @_@

You better agree Esteban

I dont get this book yet , its a little confusing so i agree with Danielle & Tiffanie , !

I think the Novel "Out of The Dust" settings explain the authincity of this novel because this story took place during a real time or occasin that really happened. For example the drought really happened wich brought all the dust and all the other things that occured in the story none, of this was made up. well mabye the characters were but i dont think the setting were....

I think that out '' of the dust '' did contribute to the authenticity of the noval as a whole.

I agree with everybody that said agree

I agree with naimah. I believe that the historical novels should be accurate to explain the reading and to help the reader better understand it.

In a historical novel the setting must be accurate and authentic because you have to know how to understand it. I say this because if you dont know if the setting is real or nonreal you're not going to know what you are reading about.For example, if i was reading Out of the Dust and didnt know what the setting was and i had to answer a question about it i wouldnt understand because i dont know the setting. Allso the setting has to be real because if you are just reading the story about a hurricane and the title is Summer , it wouldnt make sense because the article is about hurricanes but the title is Summer. Another example is that if you dont know the setting you wont be able to comprehend because it's not giving you non-real information and not telling you what the setting really is.I said this statement because readers who are reading a historical story and dont know the setting are going to be confused about the whole story because it's not giving you any good information about the setting. Another example is , say you are reading a book and the main subject they are talking about is about a big storm comming to Baltimore. You would think the setting is somewhere in Baltimore but you dont know what it really is because all it says is that it is in Baltimore. So this is my reason why i think a historical novel must be accurate and authentic.

I agree, the novels should be accurate because they need to explain the novel correctly.

In a historical novel the setting must be accurate and authentic because it helps the reader better comprehend the article. The setting must match the story.

I agree with Tykia and Brye . I agree with them because it will help you coprehend the reading much better. It will also help you because it gives you real information.

The setting must be accurate and authentic because the story is trying to give out a message and if it is false the message could be misunderstood

I agree , with Brye " Out Of The Dust does NOT have a setting and I did not undedrstand the article either.

I agree with a couple people about their veiw of the settings. In a historical novel, it has to be accurate so readers can understand and comprehend.
Also, it should be written in the correct oder so the readers also know when which event has taken place.

i think the novel "out of dust " settings explian historical events because it tells about the events that happen at that period of time.also the setting must be accuarate because you have to know what you reading and understand what you reading.i said that because you will not know if the story fiction or non-fiction.

Yes i agree with the people that said that the novel should be accurate and authentic. Everyone should have a clear mind on where the novel is taking place. Also everyone should understand the setting of the novel.

I think that the historical novels should be accurate to explain the reading and to help the reader better understand it.

I agree with brandi because it would hard to understand false information

I ageee with Nicholas's agree, authenticity is important in a historical novel because it is based on real events that happened in the past. Therefore, using unaccurate information can throw the reader offf and give them false historical facts. This will turn readerss offf to reading the novel.

travonnn!!!!!!!

I think I agree , In a historical novel the setting must be accurate and authentic because it helps the reader better understand abouth the historical events in the novel, like in" out of the dust" it shows this girl and her family has been through the dust storms which really helps me understand how was it like back then.

brisaa.i agree

I agree with mentose on what you said thats a good point

Everyone should be able to comprehend on the story and be able to answer any questions about the novel and its settings.

i agree because each novel tell us how the past was if it was good or bad and the people that were in the past too.

I agree with maria

yea i agree hello and salutations

I also agree with mentose... Like Ronald said

i gree with jennie because this do help the setting

I'm for Roll of thunder, Hear my cry because from the cover of the novel im for it has a authenic setting with fire and interesting stuff in it and i think its gonna be a good novel ,really good!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

The setting is very improtant because without it, the reader would never really know the whole point of the story or the main idea.
This can be very confusing and the reader will be lost.
Also, historic novels usually include things like facts, background information, and what has happend in the past and what will happen in the future.

I agree with Maria.

i agree with tayyab because thats what the story was about

I agree with erika , like she said historical novel must be accurate because it tells you true info. about the events in the past...

In a historical novel the setting needs to be accurate and authentic because the story its a true story.

The setting in a historical novel must be accurate and authentic because it makes sure the reading is more realistic and precise. In a historical novel the characters personality should reflected the time period and situation. For example, in Killer Angels the characters acted according to their time period and situation by the way they talked and dressed. Also since the setting was the Civil War, the characters were either confederate or union, which made them have different opinions from each other. This made the novel seem more accurate and absolute. If the setting was else where, then the story line wouldn't have made any sense.

I Argee With EveryOne Whoo Agreed...........Tehheee....

I've read all of your responces and i think you all are crazy. =)

i Agree with The reader Because You have to Read So you can Understand The Text Better and the author purpose

Yes, I think the historical element contributed to the authenticity of the story. In the story "Out of the Dust", it told the reader the time of year and location everything took place. Being as though the story was being told from first person, it gives the reader a feel that they are the actual ones experiencing what the character is going through. Also, the setting must be accurate because at the beginning of the story, it tells the reader where everything takes place and the time of year it took place. And being told in first person, it gives the reader a feeling of a first hand account.

Of course the historical element contributed to the authenticity of the story. In the story "The Killer Angels", Keeping the weapons of the solders and the behavior of the people allow the reader to be immersed in the story. The setting is also very important to historical novels. Keeping the setting in a authentic place of course keeps the novel authentic too. Imagine a book that takes place in space with humans landing on the moon...that was in 1783. That would ruin the immersion of the reader. Completely. It of course will ruin the authenticy of the story and ruin the immersion of the reader.

the story roll of thunder hear my cry is a good book ithave text feature that i can use so i can understand but also its authentic because when you find the main i dea to the story

Roll of thunder hear my cry:)

i believe the historical element must be accurate it tells the reader the time of year and location everything took place. since the story was being told from first person it lets the reader experience what the character is going through. Also the setting must be accurate because at the beginning of the story it tells the reader where everything takes place and the time of year it took place.